Women voters flock to McCain despite new Palin disclosures
By David Usborne in New York
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
John McCain has benefited in the polls since announcing his running mate was Sarah Palin, the ‘hockey mom’ Alaskan Governor
Democrats may not want to believe it but there is fresh evidence that the addition of Sarah Palin, the “hockey mom” Governor of Alaska, to John McCain’s ticket is winning him women voters in droves.
In a tidal shift that could prove decisive, enormous numbers of women who previously favoured Barack Obama have had their heads turned since the introduction of Mrs Palin, according to a new ABC/Washington Post poll.
The Palin phenomenon shows no signs of fading, in spite of a drip-drip of news revelations that hardly flatter her. Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that after becoming Governor in 2006, Mrs Palin started charging taxpayers a “per diem” allowance for days she spent in her private home in the town of Wasilla, where she was once mayor, instead of in the mansion in Juneau that she has never cared for.
Nor does there seem to be much room left for Mrs Palin to defend her claims repeated in Republican television advertisements that she opposed the now infamous “Bridge to Nowhere” project in Alaska, with clear evidence that, at first, she supported the wasteful scheme.
But for now, at least, women seem to be falling in love with Mrs Palin. They are not the only ones. A Gallup poll last night showed Mr McCain opening a 15-point lead over Mr Obama among independent voters who are not members of either of the main parties.
However, it is the hockey mom wars that will preoccupy the generals of both camps. While white women favoured Mr Obama over McCain before the conventions by 50-42 per cent, the picture today is dramatically reversed, according to the Washington Post/ABC survey. Now they back Mr McCain 53-41 per cent. That is a 20-point change.
“Your poll is wrong,” David Plouffe, the Obama campaign chief flatly told a Washington Post reporter on hearing the numbers. “I don’t think you’ll find many others that back up a 20-point reversal. We certainly are not seeing any movement like that. Polls, from time to time, particularly on the demographic stuff, can have some pretty wild swings.”
At Obama HQ in Chicago, they certainly hope so. Yet there can no longer be any doubt that the race has been transformed since the end of the St Paul convention and that it can be traced back to the anointing of Mrs Palin, the “lipstick pitbull”, and the blinding rock star status she has since assumed. Mr McCain’s campaign events are drawing crowds the likes of which he has never seen before.
The question, however, is whether it is a love affair that will last. The Obama ticket has several avenues of retaliation, including deploying women surrogates to try to plug the dam. Hillary Clinton was in Florida speaking for him on Monday and plans are afoot to send forth Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas and Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri soon.
Rather than attacking Mrs Palin directly, they will try to focus voters’ attention on matters of policy, in particular those women who voted for Mrs Clinton, whose policy priorities are just about diametrically opposed to Sarah Palin’s.
If the McCain menagerie cannot believe its luck, it is not admitting to it. Strategists have seen a doubling in just seven days of “Women for McCain”, female grassroots volunteers for his candidacy. They are now to be deployed across the swing states to canvass for him every Monday evening between now and election day. (Monday is when most husbands and boyfriends are watching football on TV.)
By joining it, Mrs Palin has become just the ticket for Senator McCain, even though a few Republicans still fret she might overshadow him. “She’s a daring and exciting pick that has really rejuvenated support and respect for Senator McCain,” campaign spokeswoman Crystal Benton said. “When she said she’d ’stand up to the ol’ boys network in Washington,’ that really inspired a lot of women.”
In a sign of the campaign’s growing confidence in her, final details have been agreed for the Governor not simply to give a sit-down interview with ABC, as was originally expected, but to give the network’s main anchor, Charlie Gibson, full access over two days beginning tomorrow in Alaska.
Gibson should, however, also have the opportunity to ask some pointed questions. Particularly the per diems claimed by the Governor when she reportedly spent 312 nights in Wasilla over 19 months. Also her husband, Todd, reportedly claimed expenses from the state for trips that he made.
Can soccer moms really swing US elections?
Sixteen years ago, Bill Clinton’s campaign mastermind Mark Penn identified “soccer moms” as a key group of voters. This group of white, suburban, middle-class voters – so-called because they spent a significant amount of time ferrying children to and from sports activities – helped propel Bill Clinton into the White House.
In 2004, George Bush’s then strategist Karl Rove focused on the so-called “security moms” who could be scared into voting Republican by playing up fears of terrorism after 9/11. This backfired because there were not enough of them to influence the race. Democratic women were more interested in healthcare, which John Kerry failed to talk about, so they failed to vote for him.
In 2008, pollsters have settled on the phrase “Sex and the City voters”, because of the surge of interest among unmarried women. Barack Obama has consistently polled well among women voters, even if Hillary Clinton won the lion’s share. Two months ago the polls showed them overwhelmingly supporting Mr Obama over John McCain.
The arrival of self-styled “hockey mom” Sarah Palin may be changing that. But the surge of interest in her among women, as reflected in the latest polls, also reveals that there is no such thing as a monolithic “female vote”. The single, low-income women who turned out for Mrs Clinton – some 18 million – are increasingly balanced by Republican women, ecstatic about Mrs Palin’s deeply conservative religious views.
**********************************************************************************************************
Here is why Marijo thinks we should read this article..
McCain Wins Women’s Votes!
I think this was a great article to share because I think it is very interesting how by just having a women running mate can influence a voters decision. The unthinkable had been thought that maybe a women running mate isn’t so bad. Although can the women really swing a whole vote? We’ll have to see! It is going to be an exciting race now knowing that women are starting to project their right to be heard.
Women have been projecting their voices since Hilary Clinton’s campaign. Sarah Palin is no less of a “real” person than Obama. He grew up in a single parent home but you dont see him bragging about being a “real” person. I think it is a poor choice, not mention hypocritical of Mccain to riticule Obama for being unexperienced and then turning around and picking a running mate who is even less experienced. The fact that she is a woman only makes things a little more difficult for the Obama campaign because now he has to watch what he say or people will think that he does not know how to treat a woman. Obama’s comment the other day is a perfect example, he said “if you put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig.” After he said this feminists across the country began to accuse him a calling Palin a pig, completely ignoring the symbolism of his statement, even after he said he was NOT literally calling Palin a pig. However, even though all this is going on I am still glad to see that Hilary Clinton is endorsing Obama and Biden. Having said all this, I think the media needs to stop sympathizing for Palin and focuz on the real issues at hand. The fact that she is a woman should not exceed the importance of the issues to be discussed.
I totally think that Sarah Palin has become this whole new superstar. John Mccain thought when he had her become the vp that he would get women voters but women are smarter than that. If we just vote for her because she is a women then where not doing our jobs. What would happen in John Mccain got sick. She has no real diplomatic policies or anything. We need to vote for someone who has real plans and goals.
Voting for a woman just because she’s a woman is the complete opposite of feminism.
I agree with you Jonathan. Instead of just voting for her because shes a women isn’t going to work they need someone to do the job properly.Won’t that just hurt them more if they get somebody who can’t handle the job?
In my opinion when it comes to voting I think people need to put aside gender and race and focus on the issues, but of course we all know that would never happen. I think in some aspect McCain is just playing the game by having Palin be his running mate. He needs those votes from the women and knows he can get them easier by having a women running mate. It’s a semi smart move in his part, but at the same time it’s foolish. I also agree with what michelle said.
I believe gender and race cloud the judgment of the voters. Its the experience and their achievements in the past we should look at. The sad truth is that people do vote based on race and gender. In the news alot of Hillary Clinton supporters now support Palin because she is female, which makes no sense in my opinion as their views and beliefs are opposite of each others.
I think that women who once voted for Hillary and are now voting for Palin are making HUGE mistakes, well anyone who is voting for Palin is making a HUGE mistakes. I dont understand how someone could vote for a woman who was thinking of banning books, tried to fire people who didn’t believe her, wasted TONS of money, and who has little to no experience!
OBAMA-BIDEN ‘08!
The whole deal with Palin is a little cruel. I really don’t like the idea of voters only voting for McCain because he has a women running with him. People need to overlook the whole sexist thing and realize what they are doing. We as American citizens need to understand that this is a very important election for us all. And electing someone because they are a running with a female is not right. Because us as a country can miss out on very important changes for this country!!!!
I agree with all of you guys here. I thinks its totally wrong that because McCain has a woman running mate all of a sudden all of these people are supporting him, maybe they agree with Palin’s ideas, but from what I’ve heard she has very little experience and that’s what i would be most concerned with, not her gender. People need to look past gender and race and focus and what’s really important, votes shouldn’t be swayed just because of a persons gender.
People need to focus on the abilities of the person,and how this country will be run.Don’t change your vote just beacuse a woman has been added to the mix. Too much emphasis has been put on the wrong issues. Your sex should not matter this is the 21st century after all. Get the right team in office and get this country back in shape. BOTTOM LINE!!!!!
I think too many people are blowing this Gender thing out of proportion. That’s it that’s, all I’ve got.
i never said it was a good thing, i just said i thought it was interesting..